Williams v. Northrup
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting the motion of defendants Ronald Samsel, Ronald Samsel, doing business as Ronald Samsel, P.E. (collectively Samsel), and Donald J. Schmidt for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them. The affidavit of the expert of Donald G. Williams, Jr. (plaintiff) at least arguably raises a triable issue of fact whether those defendants negligently designed the grease pit into which plaintiff fell (see, Hourigan v McGarry, 106 AD2d 845,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hourigan v. McGarryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Kinsman v. McGillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ciapa v. MissoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Rosenbaum v. Camps Rov TovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- CIAPA, DANIEL J. v. MISSO, OTTOAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Ciapa v. MissoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013