Legal Opinion

Williams v. Northrup

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 29, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting the motion of defendants Ronald Samsel, Ronald Samsel, doing business as Ronald Samsel, P.E. (collectively Samsel), and Donald J. Schmidt for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them. The affidavit of the expert of Donald G. Williams, Jr. (plaintiff) at least arguably raises a triable issue of fact whether those defendants negligently designed the grease pit into which plaintiff fell (see, Hourigan v McGarry, 106 AD2d 845,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hourigan v. McGarryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Kinsman v. McGillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ciapa v. MissoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Rosenbaum v. Camps Rov TovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. CIAPA, DANIEL J. v. MISSO, OTTOAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Ciapa v. MissoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API