Legal Opinion

Mauritz v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 13, 1934No. 9948Published

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Justice.

This general statement, deemed to be correct, has been taken from the appellee’s brief:

“-Eli Bell, appellee, brought this suit of trespass to try title in the district court of Jackson County, Texas, to recover certain land in that county. Appellee alleged, in substance, that on February 2, A. D. 1928, one J. M. Toas, as agent for appellee, purchased the land in question for appellee and paid for it with appellee’s money, but took the conveyance in his (Yoas’) name. This, ap-pellee said, made him the beneficial owner of the land, and Yoas a mere trustee. Subsequently, on…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. James v. FulcrodTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Corn v. Crosby County Cattle Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  3. Mead v. RandolphTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  4. Kilpatrick v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1902
  5. Neil v. KeeseTexas Supreme Court · 1849

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API