Legal Opinion
Mauritz v. Bell
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 13, 1934No. 9948Published
1Opinion of the Court
GRAVES, Justice.
This general statement, deemed to be correct, has been taken from the appellee’s brief:
“-Eli Bell, appellee, brought this suit of trespass to try title in the district court of Jackson County, Texas, to recover certain land in that county. Appellee alleged, in substance, that on February 2, A. D. 1928, one J. M. Toas, as agent for appellee, purchased the land in question for appellee and paid for it with appellee’s money, but took the conveyance in his (Yoas’) name. This, ap-pellee said, made him the beneficial owner of the land, and Yoas a mere trustee. Subsequently, on…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- James v. FulcrodTexas Supreme Court · 1851
- Corn v. Crosby County Cattle Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Mead v. RandolphTexas Supreme Court · 1852
- Kilpatrick v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1902
- Neil v. KeeseTexas Supreme Court · 1849
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.