Commissioner of Department of Housing Preservation & Development v. 72-74 Eldert Street
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Theodore Diamond, J.
After trial on September 7, 1989, for reasons stated on the record, I ruled that conditions at this building made it suitable for treatment pursuant to RPAPL article 7-A. Evidence was returned to the Department of Housing Preservation and *198Development (HPD) for safekeeping. I advised HPD of issues resulting from enactment of Laws of 1989 (ch 95).
Mortgagee’s comments about a mortgage foreclosure Referee was not persuasive (RPAPL 778 [5]; Gomez v South Williamsburg, 129 Misc 2d 542; 1981 NY Legis Ann, at 413).
At hearing on September 25, HPD presented Mr.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gomez v. South Williamsburg Better Housing Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1985