Legal Opinion

American Laundry Co. v. Copeland

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 2, 1932No. 22769PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant in error filed motion to dismiss this appeal on the grounds that the case-made was not settled, signed, and certified as provided by law, so as to confer jurisdiction upon this court; that said case-made was settled and signed without notice to the defendant in error of the time and place of such settling and signing and without the appearance of the defendant in error, or his attorney of record, and without such notice being waived. To this motion no response has been filed.

On June 22, 1931, the defendant in error was served with notice that the case-maffe would be presented to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wood v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. McKeehen v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Edgerly v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Rogers v. HolcombSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. v. Spalding RehabilitationColorado Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API