Legal Opinion

Rothholz v. Chrysler Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1970PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Fitzpatrick, J.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, wrongful death and loss of consortium alleged to have been sustained by reason of the negligence, breach of warranty and strict liability of defendants, defendants Chrysler move for an order of preclusion because of plaintiff’s failure to serve answers to interrogatories. Plaintiff cross-moves for a protective order striking certain items from the notice of discovery and inspection served by said defendants.

In opposition to the motion to preclude, plaintiff raises two objections to the service of the interrogatories. The first objection…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. O. W. Burke Co.New York Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Fiorentino v. JaquesNew York Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allen v. MinskoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Patterson v. Jewish Hospital & Medical CenterNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Zemanek v. American Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Allen v. MinskoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API