Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Selenski

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 6, 2007PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania appeals the trial court’s order dismissing charges of Escape and Weapons or Implements for Escape (the Escape charges) brought against Hugo Marcus Selenski on grounds that the Commonwealth failed to bring the charges to trial within the requisite 365 days prescribed by Criminal Rule 600. The Commonwealth contends that the Escape charges had been previously consolidated with the prosecution of two of Selenski’s five pending homicide charges, which were timely prosecuted and reasons that compliance with Rule 600 relative to the Escape…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Commonwealth v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. BoczkowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Commonwealth v. HuntSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. KrickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SELENSKISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. HoltSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Commonwealth v. WendelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Com. v. Jones, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Com. v. Lynn, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API