Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Fitzhugh v. City Council of City of Hot Springs
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided February 21, 1952No. 5414PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COMPTON, Justice.
Relator brought this action in mandamus to compel respondents to issue certificates of indebtedness, covering the cost incurred by him in laying sewer mains in the City of Hot Springs, New Mexico.
Upon filing the petition, there was issued an alternative writ of mandamus commanding respondent to take appropriate action to issue certificates of indebtedness pursuant to the provisions of Section 14-3634, N.M.S.A.1941 Comp., or show cause on a day named why the alternative writ should not be made permanent. Section 14-3634 reads: “Extension of water and sewer systems by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brown v. CobbNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
- Sundt v. Tobin Quarries, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
- Wills v. Investors Bankstocks Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Dawson v. DinwiddieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Barnett v. KempSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Raymond Pendleton v. Pan American Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Porter v. Butte Farmers Mutual Insurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Featherstone v. HansonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- Alvarez v. Board of Trustees of La Union TownsiteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
- Atlantic Refining Company v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.