Carpenter v. City of Paragould
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentBaker, J.
I have heretofore merely noted my dissent when I have not agreed with the majority of the court. I have undertaken to express my viewpoint only when I have felt that a majority was so far in error that some protest was required as a marking place to indicate the point at which the court went ■wrong. The opinion of the majority in this case is erroneous. I think the error is a demonstrable one. It is not every act or ordinance of a city council that may be deemed subject to a referendum. For instance, a group of citizens in a city like Paragould, Jonesboro, Little Rock, or Hot Springs, might…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Monahan v. FunkOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Jernigan v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- Snodgrass v. PocahontasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- McCutchen v. Siloam SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Paving District No. 36 v. LittleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926