Legal Opinion

Day v. Rasmussen

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 2006No. COA05-1314PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCullough, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from the entry of an order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment where there was no genuine issue of material fact, and defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We affirm.

On 20 October 2004 plaintiff Jaye Day (“Day”) filed actions in Wake County Superior Court against her brother defendant Paul Rasmussen (“Rasmussen”) and Timothy A. Nordgren, as executor of her father’s estate, alleging conversion, constructive trust, and tortious interference with a contract based on her father’s trust agreement. Rasmussen filed an answer and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moore v. Coachmen Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Fulp v. FulpSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. TillettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Beck v. City of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Knauer v. BarnettSupreme Court of Florida · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2012
  2. Cable v. Wells Fargo Bank New Mexico, N.A.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Comput. Design & Integration, LLC v. BrownNorth Carolina Business Court · 2018
  4. In Re Se. Eye Ctr. (Old Battleground v. Ccsea)North Carolina Business Court · 2019
  5. Day v. NordgrenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API