Legal Opinion

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*565The defendant’s contentions regarding the prosecutor’s summation at the trial under Indictment No. 1060/86 are, in part, unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, all are without merit.

Because the trial court repeatedly recited that the People must prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the charge as a whole conveyed the proper standard of proof (see, People v Talk Kwung, 186 AD2d 365).

In view of our determination with respect to the defendant’s judgment of conviction under Indictment No. 1060/86, upon a jury verdict, there is no basis for vacatur of his plea under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. Taik KwungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. DuncanNew York Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API