Legal Opinion

Federal Insurance v. Lexington Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 3, 2011No. 1-09-3296PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Brien

Presiding Justice Gallagher and Justice Lavin concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

This appeal arises from an insurance coverage lawsuit in which plaintiff, Federal Insurance Company (Federal), sought to recover from defendant, Lexington Insurance Company (Lexington), settlement payments made by Federal on behalf of its insured in a personal injury action. The circuit court held that the insured’s failure to comply with the “Notice of Circumstance” provision precluded coverage under the Lexington policy and granted summary judgment in favor of Lexington. On appeal, Federal contends…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Crum & Forster Managers Corp. v. Resolution Trust Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Steadfast Insurance v. Caremark RX, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. Film & Tape Works, Inc. v. Junetwenty Films, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. Coregis InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Delatorre v. Safeway Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  2. Frezados v. Ingalls Memorial HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API