Legal Opinion

Gillette v. Oberholtzer

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1928No. 4909PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRINCK, Commissioner.

In this action, brought by the holders of a note signed by the defendants, for the foreclosure of a mortgage securing such note, the mortgage consisting in form of deeds to real estate and a trust agreement, the defenses of duress and want of consideration, pleaded in the answer, were sustained by the findings of the trial court. The court found, however, that after the duress was removed, the defendant made certain payments upon the debt and wrote plaintiffs divers letters, assuring them of his determination to pay the note and discharge the trust agreement, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Utah State Building & Loan Ass'n v. PerkinsUtah Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Aultman & Taylor Co. v. JenkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Hudson v. MoonUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Union Central Life Insurance v. ChesterleyWashington Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WhippleIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Finlayson v. WallerIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Fogelstrom v. MurphyIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Sweeney v. American National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Valiant Idaho, LLC v. JV L.L.C.Idaho Supreme Court · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API