Legal Opinion
Stewart v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided March 3, 2004No. 324-03PublishedCited by 190 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · KeaslerKeasler, J.
joined by KELLER, P.J., and MEYERS, WOMACK, JOHNSON, HERVEY, HOLCOMB, and COCHRAN, JJ.
We withdraw our previous opinion and substitute this opinion. Dawn Kuretsch *95Stewart was convicted of driving while intoxicated. The trial judge allowed the State to present the results of two breath tests administered to Stewart eighty minutes after she was pulled over but disallowed the State’s retrograde extrapolation evidence. The Fourth Court of Appeals reversed.1 We must decide whether that court erred in determining that breath test results are inadmissible without retrograde extrapolation…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Bagheri v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Commonwealth v. JarmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. ModaffareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. LoeperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Bagheri v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by190 opinions
- State v. MechlerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Kirsch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- State of Texas v. Esparza, CarlosCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- State v. JordanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.