Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Peter Kiewit & Sons

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 30, 1981No. 79-3803, CA 18579PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, J.

The only issue in this Workers’ Compensation case is whether claimant’s injury to his left index finger, sustained while altering employer-furnished work clothes, is compensable. The Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) affirmed and adopted the referee’s opinion and order denying compensability because claimant’s injury did not arise out of and in the course of his employment. ORS 656.005(8)(a). Claimant appeals; we reverse and remand.

In December, 1978, claimant was employed by respondent as a "hydroblaster,” a sand-blasting job entailing use of a high pressure water hose. Although not a job…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rogers v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Clark v. U. S. PlywoodOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Compensation of the Beneficiaries of Clark v. U. S. PlywoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Agripac, Inc. v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API