Legal Opinion

Delgiorno v. Huisman

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1972No. 4121PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McEWAN

The plaintiffs, bona fide residents of the State, and qualified to vote except for the duration of their residence, sought a declaratory judgment, alleging the unconstitutionality of Article 6, § 2, of the Wyoming Constitution, and certain statutes,1 basing the claim upon violation of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.2

*1247It was stipulated that all plaintiffs were bona fide residents of the State of Wyoming. Plaintiff Delgiorno had been a resident of Laramie County for about five months, plaintiff Sosa for 43 days, and plaintiff Biancalana…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jarmel v. PutnamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  2. Galesburg Construction Co. of Wyoming v. Board of Trustees of Memorial Hospital of Converse CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Torres v. Laramie County School District No. 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Delgiorno v. HuismanWyoming Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Galesburg Construction Co. of Wyoming v. Board of Trustees of Memorial Hospital of Converse CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API