In Re Ah Robins Co., Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MERHIGE, District Judge.
Each of the captioned proceedings requires an interpretation of Article I, Section 1.85 of the Debtors Sixth Amended and Restated Plan of Reorganization (“Plan”), pursuant to Article VIII, Section 8.05(c). Section 1.85 defines “Unreleased Claims” under the Plan and thereby sets the parameters delimiting those suits that both involve the Daikon Shield (“Shield”) and that fall beyond the scope of the Plan’s broad injunction.
With the exception of the matter styled Dalkon Shield Claimants Trust v. Ralph G. Reiser, the initiating parties — either Daikon Shield…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- A.H. Robins Co. v. PiccininCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re A.H. Robins Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- In Re Robins Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Bergaust v. FlahertyCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
- Reichel v. Dalkon Shield Trust (In Re A.H. Robins Co.)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Dalkon Shield Trust v. ReiserCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.