Anglin v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Larry D. Vaught, Judge.
Appellant Cynthia Anglin appeals the revocation of her drug-court probation. She raises two points on appeal. The first is that the drug court failed to screen her when she first entered the program. The second is that there is insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s decision to revoke her probation. We disagree with both points and affirm.
Anglin is a fifty-three-year-old woman who, prior to the incident giving rise to this appeal, was a law-abiding citizen. She has been married to Steve Anglin for thirty-three years, cares for three children and a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barbee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Rudd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
- Baldridge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
- Hardman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
3Cited by7 opinions
- Doyle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
- Trina Honeycutt v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
- Alsbrook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
- Cohen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.