Legal Opinion

Secured Investments, Inc. ex rel. Goldman v. Badorf

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County

Decided August 8, 1921No. 206Published

Rule to open judgment. C. P. Dauphin Co., March T., 1921, No. 206.

1Opinion of the Court

Wickersham, J.,

The defendant entered into an oral contract Jan. 25, 1919, with the Secured Investments, Incorporated, for the erection of a building on lots in Old Orchard, a sub-division of record in Dauphin County, and upon the payment of $25 he received a receipt, in which it was stated, inter alia: “It is understood that if this property, including the *85ground, cannot be built for a total cost of thirty-five hundred ($3500.00) dollars, or less, this deposit is to be returned to you.” It appears to have been agreed between them that the deposit which the defendant was to pay amounted to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. SchochSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  2. Hill v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API