Legal Opinion

McDonnell v. Bell Container Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 26, 1962No. 147, Docket 27763PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a stockholder’s derivative action seeking damages in behalf of Doeskin Products, Inc., resulting from a series of schemes to victimize it, which this court once before characterized as “a bold and outrageous corporate swindle,” see McDonnell v. Tabah, 2 Cir., 297 F.2d 731, 732. We are now asked to hold that insufficient evidence existed to support Judge-Palmieri’s findings of participation by Bell Container Corporation in fraudulent transactions to supply containers and by Harold J. Simon in fraudulent transactions to supply trucking services to the milked corporation. The judge’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McDONNELL v. TABAHCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McDonnell v. BirrellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  2. McDONNELL v. BIRRELLCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  3. C. E. H. McDonnell as Trustee in Reorganization of Equitable Plan Company v. Bell Container Corporation and Harold J. SimonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API