Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Seidel

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 28, 2001No. 1790-99Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

39 S.W.3d 221 (2001)

Ex parte Charles E. SEIDEL, JR.,[1]

No. 1790-99.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

February 28, 2001.

Patricia A. Finch, Seguin, for appellant.

Matthew Paul, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before the court en banc.

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · HollandHolland, J., joined by Price, J., Keasler, J., Hervey, J., and Holcomb, J.,

On August, 17, 1997, appellee was arrested for felony driving while intoxicated and was released on a felony bond. The District Attorney's Office rejected the case on December 7, 1997—it never filed an indictment or an information in district court. On April 16, 1998, appellee filed a writ of habeas corpus asserting that because the State…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Garcia v. DialCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Van Hoang v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Ex Parte SeidelCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  4. Ex Parte McIverCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API