Legal Opinion

H. Kempner v. Welker

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1929No. Civil No. 2863Published

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

Action to recover on two past-due promissory notes for $2,150 each, signed by defendants Welker and Clifford and payable to H. Kempner.

The first paragraph of plaintiff’s complaint is in the following words:

“Plaintiff is a trust Company, duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Massachusetts, and its Trustees are I. H. Kempner, D. W. Kempner, R. Lee Kempner, S. E. Kempner and J. Seinsheimer, and doing business under the firm name and style of H. Kempner, with its principal office and place of business at G-alveston, State of Texas.”

And the first paragraph of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reilly v. ClyneArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Clark v. WesendorfArizona Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API