In re Estate of Keefauver

*187OPINION

By HORNBECK, J.

It is the claim of counsel for Mrs. White, first, that actual manual delivery of the certificate during the lifetime of Mr. Keefauver was not necessary to pass the ownership to the $1000.00 represented by the certificate of deposit; and, second, if it is necessary, such delivery was properly made.

We are in no doubt whatever, granting to the trial court its prerogative to weigh the facts, that both claims of counsel for Mrs. White are well supported. It is not necessary to determine the narrow question whether or not at the time that the certificate of deposit was made in…