Legal Opinion

State v. . Kelly

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1887PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

(S. v. Crayton, 6 Ired., 164; S. v. Blackwelder, Phil., 38; S. v. Bray,67 N.C. 283; S. v. Jenkins, 84 N.C. 812; S. v. Epps, 76 N.C. 55; S. v.Payton, 89 N.C. 539; S. v. Sheets, ibid., 543, cited and approved.) The defendant was indicted at the October Term, 1885 of the Criminal Court of the county of Mecklenburg, for the crime of larceny.

Being under recognizance to answer in that behalf at that time, he appeared in person, having counsel present, and pleaded not guilty, and was put upon his trial. He was present during the trial, as was also his counsel, "until the jury were returning to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Price v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1872
  2. State v. . PaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  3. State v. . JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  4. State v. . EppsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  5. State v. . BraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. HuffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. State v. DanielsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Harold S. Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
  4. State v. BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. State v. BrogdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API