State v. Browning
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
McNULTY, Judge.
This is an interlocutory appeal from an order entered by the trial judge suppressing the fruits of a warrantless search of an automobile driven by appellee. The undisputed statement of the facts is that Officers Howell and Barrington, while on patrol in the early morning hours, observed a male and female in a telephone booth and another male sitting in a 1960 *867Oldsmobile parked by the telephone booth. As the officers passed the booth they noted that the money box was intact, and upon returning shortly thereafter they noticed that the same automobile was in front of the telephone…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Godbee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mahoney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- State v. HughesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- State v. BryantDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- State v. SandersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- Odom v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971