Legal Opinion

Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 31, 1991No. 91-1170PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellants seek review of an adverse final summary judgment which reads as follows:

“THIS CAUSE coming on before the Court on the cross motions of Plaintiff, Metropolitan Dade County and Defendants, Westinghouse Electric Corporation and Schindler Elevator Corporation for final summary judgment, and this Court, having reviewed the pleadings and the attachments thereto, and having heard argument of counsel, makes the following findings:

*11351. It has been admitted by the parties, Plaintiff, Dade County and Defendants, Westinghouse and Schindler, that Defendant Westinghouse entered into a contract…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Metro. Dade Cty. v. Fla. Aviation Fueling Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Unisys Corp. v. Frank H. Poe, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Dade Cty. v. Cbm Indus. of Mn. Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. Barton-Malow Co. v. Grunau Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. Caribbean Fire & Associates, Inc. v. Coastal Construction Group of South FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  4. RJ's International Trading, LLC v. Crown Castle South, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API