Legal Opinion

E & S MEMS, L.L.C. v. Eagen

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 11, 2003No. 49A02-0301-CV-33PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

E & S MEMS, LLC., {/h/a E & S Marketing Resources and Team E & S, L.L.C, (collectively "E & S") and H. Milton Stewart appeal from the trial court's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law on William Eagen's Motion to Enforce Settle ment Agreement. E & S and Stewart raise the following dispositive issue for review: whether the trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider Eagen's motion to enforce the parties' settlement agreement when the court had previously issued an order dismissing the action with prejudice.

We reverse.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wilson v. Lowdermilk, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Hooker v. Terre Haute Gas CorporationIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Midway Ford Truck Center, Inc. v. GilmoreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. State Ex Rel. Kelley v. Marion County Criminal CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Brant Construction Co. v. Lumen Construction Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Melba Polk-King v. Discover BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Trustees of the Local 734 Bakery Drivers Health & Welfare Plan v. WolffDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API