Legal Opinion

State v. Meacham

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 15, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Information for keeping a dog without license. Heard upon general demurrer at the June term, 1894, Caledonia county, Tyler, J., presiding. Demurrer overruled. The respondent excepts.

1Per curiam

In this case the views of the judges who heard it were such that no decision could be made in regard to the sufficiency of the information. But, inasmuch as the information of the state’s attorney can be amended, by his successor in office, even, both in form and in substance, the court pro forma reversed the judgment of the county court and remanded the case to be there proceeded with.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RyeaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  2. State v. BarrellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1903
  3. State v. HarreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937