Legal Opinion

State v. Kurtz

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.

Defendants were charged by information with unlawfully possessing a still, worm, doubler, cooker, mash tub, mash barrels and 1500 gallons of mash and other equipment and utensils, fit for use in distilling brewing and manufacturing intoxicating liquors. Upon trial defendants were found guilty by the jury and defendant Kurtz’s punishment was fixed at a fine of $1000 and ten months in jail, and defendant Chaney’s punishment was fixed at a fine of $500 and six months in jail. Motion for new trial was duly filed and was overruled and defendants appealed.

The information charged jointly against the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ShourSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  3. State v. DaughertySupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. City of Maysville v. TruexSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MaloneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. State v. FreemanIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API