Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. Spicer

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 7, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownover, J.

The original bill in this cause was filed by the complainants to have set aside a trustee’s sale of mortgaged property on the ground that the sale was invalid and the sale price was inadequate. And complainants asked that in the event said sale could not be set aside complainants be given a decree for the difference between the purchase price and the indebtedness with interest and costs., The defendants answered and denied that the sale was illegally conducted, and denied that there was any surplus after the payment of the notes, interest, fees, and taxes. And they charged that Hawkins…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wilson v. BushTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Doty v. Federal Land Bank of LouisvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Bill Jones Auto Co. v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926
  4. Grosvenor v. BethellTennessee Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Woolfolk v. WoolfolkTennessee Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc. v. Southern Security Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
  2. Branstetter v. PoynterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
  3. Brown v. EckhardtCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939
  4. Spicer v. KimesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
  5. United American Financial Corp. v. First Heritage National Bank of Loudon County (In Re United American Financial Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API