State v. Eder

Defendant was sentenced to a term of six years imprisonment for first degree sodomy and attempted first degree rape. The issue on appeal is whether the sentencing court erred in quashing defendant’s subpoena of the raw test data which was used in formulating the psychological evaluation of defendant contained in the presentence report.1

Defendant was given access to the presentence report. The court also granted defendant’s motion for appointment of a psychologist to assist in preparation for the sentencing hearing. That psychologist interviewed defendant and administered the same battery of…