Legal Opinion
Rail Services of America v. State Compensation Insurance Fund
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 9, 2003No. B149183PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
Rail Services of America and Pacific Rail Services (collectively, plaintiffs) sued State Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF) for alleged misconduct related to premiums SCIF charged them for workers’ compensation insurance. SCIF made motions for summary adjudication or summary judgment as to plaintiffs’ causes of action, and succeeded in obtaining a favorable adjudication as to all but plaintiffs’ second cause of action.
The trial court denied plaintiffs’ attempts to obtain a final, appealable judgment without dismissing that remaining cause of action. Instead, it ordered them…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Deyo v. KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Petersen v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Homestead Supplies, Inc. v. Executive Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- McKenzie v. Kaiser AetnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Lyons v. WickhorstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Electronic Funds Solutions v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- In Re Marriage of ChakkoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Schilders v. DeLacey CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
- XPO Logistics Freight, Inc. v. Hayward Property, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- XPO Logistics Freight, Inc. v. Hayward Property, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022