Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Neal

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided March 20, 1984No. Civ. A. No. C83-1694APublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ROBERT H. HALL, District Judge.

Plaintiff has brought this action seeking damages for defendant’s alleged fraud and breach of contract. Jurisdiction is predicated upon diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Pursuant to this court’s order of December 19, 1983, the case has been resubmitted on defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. In addition, defendant has now moved for an enlargement of the discovery period.

FACTS

On a motion for judgment on the pleadings the moving party concedes, for the purpose of the motion only, the accuracy of the well-pleaded factual allegations of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Teasley v. BradleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Shipman v. Horizon CorporationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  5. Arthur T. Stanton v. Everett P. LarshCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Contract Furniture Refinishing v. RemanufacturingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  2. McCorvey v. PetersenDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API