Legal Opinion · Dissent

Friday v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 13, 1960No. A-12767Published

1DissentNix, Judge

I respectfully disagree with my associates as to defendant’s final contention of error. The reluctancy to concur does not arise from any illusion that defendant was prejudiced by the Court’s ruling. The evidence is conclusive as to defendant’s guilt; the minimum sentence was imposed, thus prejudice was not reflected by the record. However, in the opinion of this writer, the matter complained of was in direct conflict with Title 22 O.S.1951 § 701, which reads as follows:

“In the trial of all indictments, infor-mations, complaints and other proceedings against persons charged with the commission…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Everidge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API