Legal Opinion

Marulli v. Town of Lexington

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided February 14, 1939Published

1Opinion of the CourtPettingell, J.

Action of tort in which a passenger in an automobile seeks to recover for injuries alleged to have been caused by a defective condition of the highway. In the *54District Court, there was a finding for the plaintiff. The report states that .it contains all the material evidence.

The defendant, as appellant, contends that the case of Zacharer v. Wakefield, 291 Mass. 90, decides that, as matter of law, a hole or depression in the highway, caused by a breaking away of the macadam surface of a road where it joins the dirt shoulder, is not a defect; the plaintiff, for his part, contends, that it is a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Newton v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  2. Doherty v. Inhabitants of AyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Kelleher v. City of NewburyportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Pastrick v. S. S. Kresge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Jennings v. TompkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API