Legal Opinion

Smith v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 9, 1929No. 5415PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant was the beneficiary of three policies of insurance issued by the appellee insurance company on the life of her husband, Robert Hill Smith. Each of the policies provided for the payment of double indemnity upon proof that the death of the insured resulted from bodily injury “effected solely through external, violent and accidental means.” The face amounts of the policies were paid without prejudice to the right to maintain suit upon the double indemnity provisions.

Appellant’s petition alleged that one W. D. Haas, “without any excuse, justification or provocation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Occidental Life Ins. Co. v. HolcombCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1925

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. SargentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
  2. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. MearsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  3. Harrison v. New York Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
  4. Mullaney v. Prudential Ins. Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  5. Heyward v. Republic National Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API