Legal Opinion
Steiner v. City of New York
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 14, 1996No. 0:90-cv-01593PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLEESON, District Judge:
Plaintiff Harry Steiner alleges that he was twice falsely arrested and maliciously prosecuted, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law. Steiner named eleven individual New York City police officers and the City of New York (“the City”) as defendants in this action. The claims against the City have been bifurcated. The individual defendants (referred to herein as “the defendants”) and plaintiffs have all moved for summary judgment. The plaintiffs motion was denied on December 1,1995. For the reasons set forth below, the defendants’ motion is…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brogdon v. City of New RochelleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Shell v. BrzezniakDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- Doyle v. CoombeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
- Mason v. Village of Babylon, New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
- Banks v. PersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.