Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bayridge Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1995No. OTC 3271; OTC 3272; SC S41163Published

1DissentVan Hoomissen, J.

ORS 308.205(2) (1989) provided:

“If the property is subject to governmental restriction as to use on the assessment date under applicable law or regulation, true cash value shall not be based upon sales that reflect for the property a market value that the property would have if the use of the property were not subject to the restriction unless adjustments in value are made reflecting the effect of the restrictions.” (Emphasis added.)

The question is: “Do the low-income housing restrictions voluntarily placed on the property [by the owner] constitute ‘governmental restrictions [as to use]’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Keyes v. CHAMBERSOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Tualatin Development Co. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Bayridge Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1994
  4. Marchel v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API