Legal Opinion · Dissent

The Matter of Highbridge Broadway v. Assessor of the City of Schenectady

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 2016No. 49Published

1DissentStein, J.

It has long been commonly understood that a taxpayer who commences an RPTL article 7 proceeding challenging an assessment in a specific tax year must commence annual proceedings to protest subsequent assessments while the initial proceeding is pending in order to preserve the right to a refund for taxes paid in any additional years. The majority now deviates from that rule in the context of a real property tax exemption, despite the absence of any statutory language in RPTL 485-b compelling its conclusion. In my view, the majority’s holding is inconsistent with the statutory scheme set forth…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Adrico Realty Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Emunim v. Town of FallsburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. People Ex Rel. Hilton v. FahrenkopfNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. Mercury Machine Importing Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API