Ransom v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McCORMICK, Presiding Judge.
Appellant, Kenneth Ray Ransom, appeals from his conviction for capital murder where the death penalty was assessed as punishment. On appeal to this Court, appellant raises fourteen points of error. Finding all points of error to be without merit, we accordingly affirm the conviction.
The Sufficiency of Evidence
Appellant claims that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the jury’s determination of guilt. Reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, the record reflects the following:
Appellant was with his girl friend, Wanda Phillips, at…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Kemp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Nenno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Hai Hai Vuong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.