United States v. Corn Products Refining Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
In Equity. Suit by the United States against the Corn Products Refining Company, the National Starch Company, the St. Roms Syrup & Preserving Company, the Novelty Candy Company, Penick & Ford, Rimited, Edward T. Bedford, William J. Matheson, Frederick T. Bedford, Frederick T. Fisher, C. H. Kelsey, A. B. Boardman, George S. Mahana, George M. Moffett, William H. Nichols, Jr., A. A. Smith, James Speyer, E. Beverly Walden, C. M. Warner, Thomas P. Kingsford, R. S. Burns, E. A.…
Read the full summary
In Equity. Suit by the United States against the Corn Products Refining Company, the National Starch Company, the St. Roms Syrup & Preserving Company, the Novelty Candy Company, Penick & Ford, Rimited, Edward T. Bedford, William J. Matheson, Frederick T. Bedford, Frederick T. Fisher, C. H. Kelsey, A. B. Boardman, George S. Mahana, George M. Moffett, William H. Nichols, Jr., A. A. Smith, James Speyer, E. Beverly Walden, C. M. Warner, Thomas P. Kingsford, R. S. Burns, E. A. Eohmeyer, Benjamin Schneewind, C. W. Eohmeyer, Edward T. Bedford, 2d, A. N. Watkins, C. H. Eorenz, Eouis Suss, William S.…
1Opinion of the Court
I. Ths Condition on the; Starch Industry in 1890.
EEARNED HAND,
District Judge (after stating the facts as above). [1] Starch is used for mill, laundry, and food purposes and is sold both in bulk and in packages. Its method of manufacture at the present time is not in substance different from that employed 26 years ago. The raw product is the ordinary Indian maize or corn, which is bought already separated from the husk, and is first soaked or steeped in hot water impregnated with sulphur. The water is left upon the kernel until it is quite soft, when it is run between two plates of rough,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Eastern States Retail Lumber Dealers' Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- United States v. Crescent Amusement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- George R. Whitten, Jr., Inc., D/B/A Whitten Corporation v. Paddock Pool Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.