Legal Opinion

T.A.H. First, Inc. v. Clifton Leasing Co.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 15, 2014No. 639, 2013PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRINE, Chief Justice:

The origins of this case can be found in a prior appeal between these same parties that had a confusing procedural context. The appellant, T.A.H. First, Inc. (“T.A.H. First”) had suffered a default judgment because it failed to answer the complaint of the appellee, Clifton Leasing Company, Inc., t/a Delmarva Kenworth (“Clifton”), in a timely manner.1 T.A.H. First moved the Superior Court to vacate the default judgment. The Superior Court denied that motion, and specifically held that not only was T.A.H. First not entitled to defend the claims brought by Clifton against…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. LaPoint v. AmerisourceBergen Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  2. State v. National Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1972
  3. Wilson v. BrownSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  4. Tah First, Inc. v. Clifton Leasing Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2011

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cancan Development, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2015
  2. Okpala v. The Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
  3. Windsor I, LLC v. CWCaptial Asset Management LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API