Legal Opinion
Siegel v. Watson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 26, 1957No. Civ. A. 2969-54PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CURRAN, District Judge.
This is a civil action brought by the plaintiff, Lewis A. Siegel, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 145 to authorize the defendant, Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents, to issue to plaintiff Letters Patent containing claims 1, 7, 21, 43, 44, 45, 46, 49, 50, 51, 53, 55, 56, 58, 59, 67 and 68 of plaintiff's application Serial No. 153,430, entitled “Vibration Variation Control”, filed April 1, 1950.
These claims were rejected on one or both of two grounds, (1) as being unpatentable over the prior art, or (2) as being functional and indefinite or as otherwise failing to point…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Yale Electric Corporation v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Esso Standard Oil Company v. Sun Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Century Distilling Co. v. Continental Distilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. DunnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lewis A. Siegel v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Lewis A. Siegel v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959