In Re Applebaum
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
The second specification alone covers the omission to schedule the sister as a creditor; it is general, merely alleging that he failed to put into his schedules the name of all his creditors. It was certainly bad on exception, and perhaps bad anyway; but, as the point was apparently not raised, we proceed to the merits: Kate Samuels had lent at least $3,000,'apparently $4,000 in all, to the bankrupt, and held some insurance policies as security. Just why he did not include her does not very satisfactorily appear. Whether he thought the collateral canceled the debt, whether he merely expected…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Page v. PageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Griggs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
- Commonwealth v. LangleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- In Re the Examination of DunfeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- In re DresserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In the Matter of Gerald A. Mascolo, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Banks v. Siegel. Matter of BanksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- Beneficial Consumer Discount Co. v. Barrett (In Re Barrett)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- In Re MonschDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1937
- In Re ErnstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.