Legal Opinion

Tomaino v. 209 East 84th Street Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 6, 2010PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul G. Feinman, J.), entered October 19, 2009, which denied defendant’s motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and to preclude plaintiffs’ expert testimony, respectively, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant failed to satisfy its prima facie burden of establishing the absence of issues of fact concerning the injured plaintiff’s inability to identify the cause of her fall and whether it created or had actual or constructive notice of the hazardous condition that caused the fall (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., *46164 NY2d 851,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Pena v. Women's Outreach Network, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Gramm v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  4. Gramm v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Seivert v. Kingpin Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Valverde v. Great Expectations, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. A.L. v. New York City Hous. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  3. Esponda v. Ramos-CiprianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. Johnson v. 675 Coster St. Hous. Dev. FundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  5. Tsotakos v. TSE Group, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API