Klein v. Cavi Acquisition, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*377The memoranda of law submitted in connection with the parties’ dispositive motions are not included in the record. Although, as Loeb now contends, the issue of whether the corporate veil of defendant CAVI Acquisition, Inc., a Delaware corporation, should be pierced is governed by Delaware law (see e.g. Sweeney, Cohn, Stahl & Vaccaro v Kane, 6 AD3d 72, 75 [2004], lv dismissed 3 NY3d 751 [2004]), in letter briefs submitted to Supreme Court, both parties maintained that the law to be applied was not material to the outcome. Loeb argued that petitioner’s “claim is no more valid under New York law…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fletcher v. Atex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- First Bank of the Americas v. Motor Car Funding, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Mobil Oil Corporation v. Linear Films, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
- Recovery Consultants, Inc. v. Shih-HsiehAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Farm Stores, Inc. v. School Feeding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cobalt Partners v. GSC Capital Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Burton F. Clark, Inc. v. Hillside Companies, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- MMA Meadows at Green Tree, LLC v. Millrun Apartments, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- BurtonF.Clark,Inc.vHillsideCompanies,Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Cobalt Partners v. GSC Capital Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.