Brecht v. Copper Sands, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not err in granting plaintiffs motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was inconsistent and against the weight of the evidence. The jury’s finding that defendant was negligent in allowing a dangerous condition to exist at the entranceway of its restaurant cannot be reconciled with the finding that the condition was not a proximate cause of plaintiffs fall (see, Bucich v City of New York, 111 AD2d 646, 647). Although defendant claimed that plaintiff caused her own fall because she was intoxicated and failed…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bucich v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mazurek v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Skibinski v. ArmyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Murphy v. HolzingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Toyos v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Murdock v. Stewart's Ice Cream Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.