Legal Opinion

Brecht v. Copper Sands, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 14, 1997PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not err in granting plaintiffs motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was inconsistent and against the weight of the evidence. The jury’s finding that defendant was negligent in allowing a dangerous condition to exist at the entranceway of its restaurant cannot be reconciled with the finding that the condition was not a proximate cause of plaintiffs fall (see, Bucich v City of New York, 111 AD2d 646, 647). Although defendant claimed that plaintiff caused her own fall because she was intoxicated and failed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bucich v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mazurek v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Skibinski v. ArmyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Murphy v. HolzingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Toyos v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. Murdock v. Stewart's Ice Cream Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API