Legal Opinion · Dissent

Shaulis v. Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 2003No. 44 MAP 2000Published

1DissentJustice Saylor

I respectfully disagree with the conclusion of the majority that an advisory opinion issued pursuant to Section 1107(10) of the Ethics Act is a “final opinion” subject to appeal, as well as its determination that Section 1103(g) is unconstitutional as applied to former government employees who are attorneys.

With respect to appealability, in Section 1108 of the Ethics Act, entitled “Investigations by commission,” the Legislature provided for appeals from opinions and orders “which become[ ] final in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.” 65 Pa.C.S. § 1108(i). Section 1108 contains…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. ReichSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Wajert v. State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Forti v. New York State Ethics CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Bar Ass'n v. ThornburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Gmerek v. State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API