Mingledorff v. Bell

I agree with the majority that under the terms of the insurance policy here no coverage was afforded to the operation by Peterson of his mother’s car. I think, however, that it should be observed that there *688is nothing in the record upon which to conclude that there was any bailment contract between Mrs. Peterson, the owner, and Bell, who owned the truck stop and service station.

In her affidavit Mrs. Peterson asserts that the son, 17 years of age, lived in the home with her, and that: “On September 14, 1959, my son took my 1949 Ford automobile to have the car greased and the oil changed. He…