Legal Opinion

Tilly v. Woodham

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1935No. 5124PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

Plaintiff sued defendant for past-due rent on an apartment in the city of Shreveport and provisionally seized one Dodge coupé, then on the leased premises, the property of intervener, Ethridge-At-kins Corporation. The intervener contends that the coupé, notwithstanding its presence on the leased premises when seized, was not subject to the lessor’s privilege for unpaid rent, as it was only transiently or accidentally thereon, within the purview of article 2708 of the Civil Code. This contention is controverted by plaintiff.

The lower court sustained plaintiff’s position and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jefferson v. GammSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Twining v. City of ElginAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
  3. Loque v. Baptist-Golding Motor Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  4. Tex-La Realty Co. v. EarnestLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Turner v. RatcliffLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jones v. DietrichLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Ethridge-Atkins Corporation v. TillyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Tilly v. WoodhamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Boone v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  5. Harmon v. MooreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API