Weed Sewing-Machine Co. v. Baker
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri
At Law. Action in ejectment.
1Opinion of the Court
McCrary, J.,
(orally.) In this canse the parties waived a jury, and have had a hearing upon the merits before the court. The action is ejectment, to recover certain real estate within the district.
The facts, so far as it is necessary to state them, are as follows: Prior to the commencement of this suit the plaintiff had recovered in this court a decree in chancery against the defendants Franklin Baker and James W. Baker, (but not against defendant John Baker,) quieting title to the land in question in the plaintiff. It is admitted that prior to that decree the legal title was in Franklin…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Hull v. RolfsrudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
- Schuler v. FordIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
- Schwab v. Smuggler-Union Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Lockwood v. Meade Land & Cattle Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Hayti Development Co. v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920